Relative Something

*this* John W. Hays' take on things and experiences

Posts Tagged ‘Perceptions

What We Eat and Do Matters

leave a comment »

With our society’s drive for lowering the cost of food, and corporations that have a stake in the food industry who are more than happy to take advantage of it, in search of maximizing profits, the American diet has become, as one article tells it, “the elephant in the room in the debate over health care.” At the rate we are going now, even if politicians come up with the greatest health plan possible, it won’t relieve the stress our health care industry is under in dealing with the chronic health problems we bring on ourselves due to the way we choose to eat. And that is only half of our battle.

In addition to the sad state to which our diet has evolved, the other significant aspect of our physical health is our level of activity. Together, they are the one-two punch to our well-being. The daily demands of our 21st century lives just don’t provide the automatic exercise to adequately balance the calories we consume. Putting our bodies to work is something we must consciously choose to do. And it doesn’t come easy, as represented by the physics property of inertia: a body at rest remains at rest.

The difference between someone who, by all definitions, is “athletic” and someone who would never describe themselves as such, probably isn’t as great as our minds are inclined to frame. It just might be similar to the way our minds perceive the speed of  passing vehicle on the freeway. At the moment the car is passing by, it appears to be traveling at a much greater speed than after it gets ahead. Then it lingers in view and appears to be traveling at the same pace as the vehicle it just passed. Our minds tend to perceive the athletic activity as passing by too fast for us to compete. But athletic activity doesn’t need to be limited to athletes.

I like the way Jim Klobuchar expresses this thought: Everyone has an Everest. For inactive people, just becoming active can be as heroic as necessary to reverse a dangerous trend. But, when a normally sedentary person tries to do something active, they immediately experience a feeling of becoming short of breath due to exertion. In addition there is the feeling of being too hot, getting sweaty, maybe a little light-headedness. It’s enough to stop the loftiest of intentions. That’s too bad. Because there is a world of entertaining recreational activity waiting just a little ways beyond that moment of feeling miserable which stops most non-athletic people. I fear that these limitations become established all the way back at school-age phy-ed classes that fracture participants into the two distinct stereotypes of those who have ability and those who don’t. What if we found a way to teach people how to get beyond that first experience of oxygen debt to discover the possibilities on the other side?

I think it is sad, really, that athletes are the only ones that get to know what it’s like. It doesn’t take an athlete to learn how to get over that first hurdle and play active games, even a simple game of tag, and continue to play for a period of time after that first onset of the feelings of oxygen debt. It is a time that you might hear described as having a “second wind.” It is a magical place to discover. It would be a valuable tool in the journey toward optimizing physical health. And we can use all the tools we can get, because it matters what we eat and do.

Written by johnwhays

September 23, 2009 at 7:00 am

Posted in Chronicle

Tagged with ,

Expand Awareness

leave a comment »

Our incredible brain machine is on my mind. Thinking about our thinking can get pretty tricky and sort of convoluted. It’s like getting in an argument with someone you live with and instead of arguing about the original point that triggered the debate, you find yourself fighting over the mechanics of the argument. Or like trying to make up a game in the neighborhood and spending the whole time arguing over what the rules will be and never getting around to actually playing the game.

There is an article from June of 2008 in The New Yorker that I was pointed to online. Fascinating. It is 8 pages long, so if you are interested in reading it, and I highly recommend it, then be prepared to sit down and read a chapter of a book. It is worth it. Among very many things covered in the article, there is a reference to how our minds are able to assemble an image from incomplete data. We do it unconsciously. I expect everyone, including myself, takes this for granted, but think about it! The author uses the example of viewing a dog through a picket fence where our eyes are only able to perceive separated slices of the animal, yet our mind is able to conjure a fully intact dog and visualize what the animal looks like. Our brain processes it for us without needing to think about it.

I am reminded of a scene from the documentary/drama “What the Bleep!?: Down the Rabbit Hole” where they claim the first time a native tribe witnessed an ocean-crossing vessel on their horizon of the sea, they didn’t “see” it because they had no reference of what it could be, so it just didn’t compute. I found it hard to accept at the time, but now I can understand what was being portrayed. Having no concept of what that ship was, no reference of having stood on one or walked around one to know how big it is, that image on the horizon must have made no sense at all. The mind couldn’t process that unconscious step of forming the image.

At the same time, it occurs to me that our minds are pretty adept at conjuring up threats that don’t actually exist. Many of the fears and phobias our mind conjures up are figments of imagination. The monster under the bed or the boogie man in the darkness. The spinning view of vertigo for someone uncomfortable with heights. Or, as the article graphically presents, the itching that has no source.

Also from the article, consider how the multitude of sensors of our skin can ignore the collar on our neck all day long, but when a thread pokes out of the tag, it has us scratching and fussing to fix it. The skin works with the brain. But sometimes, as the article reveals, the brain takes initiative to control without bothering to get input from the skin.

When we are adept enough, or introspective enough, it is a spectacular refinement to unravel the unconscious acrobatics that occur in our minds and harness the power for personal gain: optimal health of mind, body, and spirit. You might even call it, achieving a bit of enlightenment.

Expand your awareness. Think about it!

Written by johnwhays

September 8, 2009 at 7:00 am

Posted in Chronicle

Tagged with , ,

Lung Lessons

leave a comment »

.

Asth•ma | noun |  A respiratory condition marked by spasms in the bronchi of the lungs, causing difficulty in breathing. It usually results from an allergic reaction or other forms of hypersensitivity.

.

Way back in December of 2008, I went to my clinic for a physical, to get a doctor’s authorization for my trek in the high altitudes of the Himalayan Mountains of Nepal. I was told, at the time, that I displayed a partial airway obstruction and was then referred to a pulmonary specialist for further diagnosis. It was at the pulmonary clinic that I finally succumbed to the realization that I have an identifiable respiratory condition that falls under the label of asthma. I had been living my life up to that point in unconscious denial. The diagnosis really shocked me. I had never experienced an ‘attack’ of the type I identified as ‘real’ asthma, and never related the noun, asthma, as anything having to do with me. But, in retrospect, I have come to recognize plenty of the simple colds that settled in my lungs as related. Also, there were a few times bronchitis required treatment at the clinic, and plenty of times when I endured prolonged days of intense coughing and deep lung congestion. To me, it was just a cough. I never considered it a version of asthma.

The pulmonary specialist gave me a prescription for two different asthma medications: one to take daily for long-term control of airway inflammation, and then for short-term prevention, a bronchodilator for use prior to intense activity. I began using them right away in hopes of maximizing my chances of avoiding any limitations during the trek, scheduled to occur 4 months later. During that period, I never felt confident that I was able to discern a difference between being on the medications or not. There were periods when I assumed I was benefiting, but at the same time, since they were not dramatic differences, I wondered if I wasn’t just enjoying psychosomatic results. I thought I should do better, so I did do better!

In the end, during my Himalayan trek, I was still greatly limited by my lung condition, despite the treatment. Even though my lungs were compromised, hopefully it was less of a problem than it could have been had I not been using asthma medication. I continued to use the meds for over 3 months after I returned home, but since the results were not entirely clear to me, I eventually tired of the routine and slowly reduced the amount of the long-acting steroid, and then stopped altogether. I didn’t notice a difference.

Until now.

I have come to the conclusion that whatever my ailment is, it is a mild one. I’m a bit frustrated with the prospect of using a daily medication to treat a mild affliction, but given enough time, at least now I have come to recognize the subtle differences that treatment provides. Lately, what has emerged as the most noticeable difference is morning congestion. I have long been aware of the phenomenon that I experience in the mornings, and just assumed that’s the way I’m built. However, after having been off the asthma medications for a while, I have really been noticing the return of morning congestion. It’s the kind of condition which was entirely unnoticed in its absence during the period I was using the medication, but it sure has become obvious now that it has returned again since I stopped.

I’ve learned that there is a lot more to this asthma than just being out of breath. ‘All things lung related’ is a many nuanced topic, indeed.

Written by johnwhays

September 3, 2009 at 7:00 am

Posted in Chronicle

Tagged with ,

Purposeless Randomosity

with 5 comments

Happy September!

Do not expect to find any answers in this post. But feel free to wallow in questions that hold little in the way of purpose…

Why aren’t there weeds in the woods?

Is it possible to yawn during an angry tantrum?

Would rock ‘n’ roll music have evolved if the only instruments that existed to this day were the same ones used in classical orchestral music?

Courtesy my friend David P.: Someday, will there be an implant that allows humans to capture an image that we see through our eyes so we can take pictures without having to dig out our camera?

How would your performance at your day job be affected by having a stadium of 80,000 people watching you and the job limited to 90 minutes to complete, while the spectators cheered and jeered?

How come we still call professional sports, “sport”, when it’s become so much like work for the millionaires participating in it?

How does Lindsey Buckingham, guitarist/singer with the band Fleetwood Mac, elicit all those notes and sounds out of his guitars with that finger picking style at the speeds he does?

Do scientists get embarrassed to release reports of studies they have done that come to conclusions that are absolutely common sense obvious to all the rest of us?

Is anyone surprised when damages from disasters reach higher dollar amounts than ever before?

What if people bought artist’s work while they are still alive instead of waiting until they die?

What would it be like if everyone always smiled a genuine smile, all the time – even when it didn’t feel genuine?

Is it possible to look deeply into someone’s eyes and not really see them?

What would it be like if you had to teach someone how to be you and describe how and why you do everything the way you do?

Being *this* John W. Hays is a lot like being different than just being the same as what it would be like if I were being unlike how it is when I become aware I am being more like what it’s like when I am being like what all the other John W. Hays named individuals would be like were they to suddenly take stock in what being *this* John W. Hays would be like in any other shoes than mine, if you know what I mean.

Written by johnwhays

September 1, 2009 at 7:00 am

Perspectives

with 2 comments

Everything is relative. Occasionally our perceptions may actually be accurate. Lately, I have found myself thinking, not so much about things that rarely happen, but about how amazing it is that they don’t happen more often. Does that make any sense?

It may actually be that they do happen often and that we don’t perceive it that way. Don’t you hate it when you accidentally swallow wrong and end up choking on your own saliva? Mention something like that and there is an immediate response of recognition. Everybody does that. Not all the time, but enough that we all relate to it with distinct familiarity. (And how often does it happen in a quiet place with a lot of people around? Why is that?) It amazes me that swallowing wrong doesn’t happen more often. Think of how many times you swallow everyday. There are so many possibilities for calamity everyday, yet we glide through the majority of our days successfully avoiding them. Even the extreme situation of death is a possibility that remains a constant reality.

I feel like I should be trying to sell insurance at this point, but I’m attuned to our differing perceptions. Like how often things happen. For the most part, we avoid death everyday and so do all the people we know. But have you ever seen a day when there were no names listed in the obituary of your local newspaper? Then consider that it holds true for every newspaper in cities across the nation and likely over the world. That’s a lot of deaths. Everyday. All the more amazing how often our days go by unscathed. That’s the other way to look at that same thing. How often some things don’t happen. Think about how often you drive or ride in a car and are not involved in a collision. But for the grace of God go I.

On Friday, Cyndie and I came upon a backup of traffic and soon discovered flashing lights of emergency vehicles and it became apparent they had closed the road to all southbound traffic and we were forced to turn. I glanced to see a small bicycle and a shoe by some clothes on the road. Sobering. Several hours later we passed through the intersection from the other direction to find that southbound lane still closed and state officials now engaged in reconstructing the incident. All signs pointed toward a fatality. For whatever reason, we have yet to learn from local news sources, any news of what had happened.

For those involved, this was a major drama; a life shattering disaster. The rest of the world doesn’t know anything occurred. If someone well-known dies, the shared grief can get so intense it is palpable. If you just happened to drive a different route in town on Friday night, you would be oblivious that anything of significance had transpired. If we were to feel equal grief for every situation of death in the world we would be incapacitated, so maybe it is a defense mechanism that we don’t.

And maybe when there is occasion where we do feel the grief, part of the intensity is our conscience taking advantage of the opportunity to release the emotion that has been held in reserve for all the others having passed when we paid no heed. A way of achieving some universal balance.

In the mean time, consider the perspective of seeing how many things function the way they are designed and how often things actually go right. Notice how many times you swallow correctly today. It is impressive how many things go right every day.

Written by johnwhays

June 7, 2009 at 10:17 am

Posted in Chronicle

Tagged with