Relative Something

*this* John W. Hays' take on things and experiences

Cycling Subtleties

with 3 comments

The month of July, to me, means Tour de France. The attention this particular bike race draws is unmatched by any other, and the camera angles provided on the television coverage are astounding. It feels like you are right there to witness every aspect of this race. If you have ever spent long hours on a bike, you can sense what the professional racers are going through. It adds a lot to the experience of watching the broadcasts of the stages.

There is no denying a positive effect that watching the race inspires in us novices when we get off the couch and out on our own bikes. In our minds, it seems like our riding is pretty much the same thing as what we’ve seen of the race, just on an entirely different scale of difficulty. Those racers function at a level that is worlds beyond what the rest of us experience.

Moving from bike racers to the general population, there is a significant difference of abilities in the full spectrum of bike riders in a community. Too often, I feel like the act of riding a bike gets generalized when it comes to making decisions about design of roadways and trails. The same thing seems to happen for people developing opinions about riders and their behaviors. As I ride my bike to and from work, competing with rush-hour traffic  and struggling to navigate the variety of hassles –natural and man-made– that tend to get more annoying each day I face them, I find myself doubting that anyone beyond a select few really understands what it is like.

One obvious hazard is caused by drivers who take offense at sharing the road with cyclists. That is compounded by road shoulders that have suffered from neglect to the point of being unrideable. Many a day of commuting, I find myself wishing I could bring along a city planner on the ride and let them experience what it is like to ride with a purpose, at 16 or 18 mph, and dodge damaged asphalt, sand piles of runoff from rain showers, broken glass and debris, and encroaching overgrowth of vines and tree branches, to finally reach a busy intersection with no button to trigger the light to change.

If I was simply out enjoying a stroll on my bike, I would not likely choose these routes. Kids playing on their bikes don’t ride these routes. Bike trails to the park are a wonderful idea, but they don’t support riding at commuting speeds and rarely lead to the obvious destinations of someone riding to work. I wonder how many of the people who question why a cyclist would ride the road, instead of a trail, in communities where there are many cross streets, have ever pedaled their bike at 18 mph. It’s a no-brainer, trust me.

It may not be the Tour de France, but biking to work can be its own endurance test. I don’t have what it takes to race. Some days, I find I don’t even have what it takes to bike to work. In July, I find plenty of inspiration from seeing what the professionals endure, to help me push on against the relative hazards I face.

Written by johnwhays

July 15, 2010 at 7:15 am

Posted in Chronicle

Tagged with

3 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. And I use it for the opposite situation, the lack of traffic. I think I like my situation better.

    Steve R.'s avatar

    Steve R.

    July 15, 2010 at 10:59 am

  2. I am aware of that, and very pleased for it, yet it doesn’t address the situation I run into.

    The busy intersections in the morning and afternoon rush will not present the opportunity for condition (4) above, to be met.

    I have to wait for the approaching turn lane to get a green and then try to cross just before or after that group makes their turn.

    I can trigger it if I break my path, cross lanes to the other side of the road where there is a pedestrian crosswalk and push their button. But then I am on the wrong side of the road to ride. You know the drill.

    johnwhays's avatar

    johnwhays

    July 15, 2010 at 10:38 am

  3. John, FYI, you do not need a button at red lights. See below.

    Minnesota Statutes – 169.06 SIGNS, SIGNALS, MARKINGS.

    Subd. 9. Affirmative defense relating to unchanging traffic-control signal. (2010 changes underlined)
    (a) A person operating a bicycle or motorcycle who violates subdivision 4 by entering or crossing an intersection controlled by a traffic-control signal against a red light has affirmative defense to that charge if the person establishes all of the following conditions:
    (1) the bicycle or motorcycle has been brought to a complete stop;
    (2) the traffic-control signal continues to show a red light for an unreasonable time;
    (3) the traffic-control signal is apparently malfunctioning or, if programmed or engineered to change to a green light only after detecting the approach of a motor vehicle, the signal has apparently failed to detect the arrival of the bicycle or motorcycle; and
    (4) no motor vehicle or person is approaching on the street or highway to be crossed or entered or is so far away from the intersection that it does not constitute an immediate hazard.
    (b) The affirmative defense in this subdivision applies only to a violation for entering or crossing an intersection controlled by a traffic-control signal against a red light and does not provide a defense to any other civil or criminal action.
    EFFECTIVE DATE.This section is effective the day following final enactment (April 16, 2010).

    Steve R.'s avatar

    Steve R.

    July 15, 2010 at 9:36 am


Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.